Thursday, March 28, 2013

Holy Thursday



“It is the Passover of the Lord.”
With these words, 
God institutes the sacred meal and celebration
in which the Israelites
would commemorate God’s salvation of them
when they were slaves in Egypt.
It is called in Hebrew pesach, 
which we translate as “Passover,”
in part because it celebrates God’s “passing over”
the homes of the Israelites,
which had been marked with the lamb’s blood,
sparing them from the final and most terrible plague:
the destruction of the first born.
But it is also a celebration of the Israelites “passing over”
from slavery into freedom,
from bondage in Egypt 
into the land of God’s promise,
from oppression and death 
into new life as God’s covenant people.

It was therefore appropriate that Jesus
would adapt the Passover tradition
in instituting his own sacred meal,
the meal in which his followers would commemorate
Jesus’ passing over from death to life,
and their own passing over 
from the captivity to sin and death
into the freedom of God’s grace 
and the life of eternal glory.
As St. Augustine said, 
“all the mysteries of the Old Testament
were fully consummated
when Christ handed over to his disciples
the bread that was his body
and the wine that was his blood” 
(Sermo Mai 143).

Over the course of the next three days,
we will be celebrating Jesus’ passing over
as well as our own passing over:
our passage from bondage into freedom,
from death into life.
But what does that mean concretely?
What does it look like to undertake this journey,
this passage, into freedom and into life?

Pope Benedict wrote, 
“Love is the very process of passing over,
of transformation, of stepping outside 
the limitations of fallen humanity –
in which we are all separated from one another
and ultimately impenetrable to one another –
into an infinite otherness” 
(Jesus of Nazareth, vol. 2, 54-55).
To pass over is to step out of ourselves
and into the infinite mystery of divine love,
the gift of love that makes possible 
true love for one another.

This passing over from self-centeredness
to God-centeredness and to neighbor-centeredness
was echoed by our new Pope, Francis,
just yesterday in his first Wednesday audience:
“to live Holy Week following Jesus
means learning to come out of ourselves. . .
to reach out to others, to go to the outskirts of existence,
ourselves taking the first step towards our brothers and sisters,
especially those farthest away,
those who are forgotten,
those most in need 
of understanding, 
consolation,
help.”

We live the mystery of the Passover of the Lord
by passing over from self-centeredness to find the other
at the outskirts of existence,
by coming out of ourselves into the mystery of love
in an exodus from bondage to our own needs and desires,
through the mystery of divine love,
and into the promised land of freedom.
The final end of our passing over will only arrive
when we live fully in God’s presence in eternal glory,
but we already begin to live it now
in the hearing of God’s word, in prayer, in the sacraments,
and in loving service to our neighbor.

In a few moments we will obey Jesus’ command
to wash one another’s feet,
as a sign of the passing over from self to other
that lies at the heart of our Holy Week celebration.
But we do not simply wash the feet of others;
we also let our own feet be washed,
because Jesus says that it is only if he washes our feet
that we can share in his inheritance.
The word pesach, which we translate “Passover,”
can also mean “to stumble” or “to trip.”
And we all know, if we are honest with ourselves,
that in our passing over from love of self 
to love of God and neighbor
we often stumble,
we almost always trip over ourselves 
in one way or another.
So tonight we let Jesus, 
in the person of our fellow Christian,
wash our feet with the pure water of his love.
Tonight we who have stumbled let Jesus pick us up
and join our passing over to his own,
so that through him and with him and in him
we can continue our exodus
into the mystery of divine love.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

Lent 3




It has been an interesting week to be a Catholic.
Of course everybody who has access to any form of media
knows that Pope Benedict’s resignation from the papacy 
took effect on Thursday
and that the Church has entered a period of sedes vacans,
or the empty chair of Peter,
as we await the election of a new Pope by the college of Cardinals.

In my mind, this event is framed 
by two other events from this week:
on Monday the Scottish Cardinal Keith O’Brien resigned
amidst accusations of sexual misconduct with several priests,
and on Friday the Archdiocese of Baltimore issued a statement
that one of my brother deacons had been suspended from ministry
after his arrest for possession of child pornography.

Sad to say, for all too many people 
such news has ceased to be shocking,
because it has come to seem like business as usual 
from the Catholic Church.
And I find myself praying that God will seize this opportunity
to send us a leader who can make the Church into the kind of place
where at least such things regain their capacity to shock.

So what does the Word of God offer us today?
We hear in the Gospel the parable of the fig tree,
which for three years produces no fruit,
after which the owner of the orchard, 
justly and understandably frustrated,
tells the gardener to cut it down 
so that it will no longer deplete the soil.
But the gardener pleads with the owner 
to give the tree one more year,
during which he will tend it and fertilize it.

Early Christian interpreters such as St. Augustine
saw the parable as a warning to Christians that,
while we have been granted another season of grace
in which to bear the fruit of good works,
a day of judgment and reckoning is coming
for those whose lives remain barren.

But perhaps this parable 
is not just about us as individuals,
but also about us as a Church.
Events not just this week but over the past ten years
have led me often to wonder whether our Church
has become like the fig tree,
exhausting the soil around it
while producing no fruit but scandal upon scandal,
sucking life from the world
and offering nothing in return but one more excuse
for the cynicism that so pervades modern life.
Is time running out for our Church to bear good fruit?
Could the day arrive when God decides 
that the time has come to cut it down?
Christ said that the gates of hell 
would not prevail against his Church,
but we must also remember the words of St. Paul:
“whoever thinks he is standing secure 
should take care not to fall.”

These are dark thoughts to have on the eve of a papal election.
And they bring with them the temptation to think
that what is needed to fix the Church
is a Pope who fits with my particular agenda:
whether that is a Pope who will ordain women to the priesthood
or impose the Latin Mass on all parishes,
or change the Church’s teaching on contraception
or excommunicate all the bad Catholics.
These might be good ideas or bad ideas,
but a solution more radical than any of these is called for,
a solution that fits neither a “conservative” agenda nor a “liberal” one, 
a solution that is hinted at in the parable of the fig tree.

The gardener in the parable says
that he will cultivate the ground around the tree and fertilize it.
What our translation rather primly translates as “fertilizer”
is the Greek word kopria, which really means “excrement.”
A Pope from many centuries ago, Gregory the Great,
said, in reference to this parable, that the fertilizer that can make
the unfruitful tree of our souls fruitful once again
is the remembrance of the dung of our past sins;
the frank acknowledgement of the stench of our own misdeeds 
can pierce our hearts
and move us to begin bearing 
the fruit of good and godly deeds (Homily 31).

And what is true of us as individuals 
is just as true of us as a Church.
The Church must clear away all of the weeds that are choking it:
the desire to protect careers and images at all costs,
the denial that the world’s evils are found in the Church as well,
the denigration of any who would dare to call us to account.
The Church must be fertilized by facing up to the foulness of her failings,
and let her heart be pierced by the stench of her own sins,
so that we can in due season bear fruit
that will feed a world that is spiritually starving.

Perhaps our next Pope can help us to do this.
But the Church stands 
on the promise of Christ to remain with us,
not on the dream of a Pope 
who will fix everything that is wrong with us.
Still, we should pray in this time of sede vacans 
for God to send us a leader
who, like the gardener in the parable,
will cultivate and fertilize the Church with honest repentance.
And we should not only pray, but pray with confidence,
because we know that while our past is ours, and we must own it,
our future belongs to the God 
whose grace can make a barren fig tree fruitful
and make a desert bush burn with the fire of God’s presence,
the God whose Spirit, 
despite our best efforts to quench it,
still burns as a refiner’s fire within the Church, 
the living body of Christ. 

Sunday, February 3, 2013

4th Sunday in Ordinary Time



In today’s Gospel, the people who,
at the beginning of the story, “all spoke highly” of Jesus
and “were amazed at the gracious words that came from his mouth,”
have become by the end of the passage a mob “filled with fury,”
who try to throw Jesus over a cliff.

This change in attitude seems to occur
when Jesus recalls for them two stories in which
the prophets Elijah and Elisha came to the aid of Gentiles –
the starving widow of Zarephath and the leper Naaman the Syrian –
rather than helping their fellow Israelites.
Presumably what fills them with fury is the implication
that Jesus has come not only for them,
to fulfill God’s promises to Israel,
but also for others,
to extend God’s saving covenant to the Gentiles.
Their fury is, I think, rooted in fear:
the fear that God’s favor
is a limited commodity,
so that the more God loves others
the less he loves them;
the fear that there is only so much room
within God’s covenantal love,
so that the inclusion of others in that love
might mean their exclusion.

As is so often the case with the Gospels,
the figures we read about invite us to reflect on our own lives.
Do we treat God’s love as if it were a limited commodity?
Do we react with envy when others benefit?
Do we find ourselves filled with fury
because we fear that another’s gain is our loss?
And if we find such fear and fury in ourselves,
do we ask ourselves, is this who I really want to be?

In Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s novel The Brothers Karamazov
a character recounts a Russian folktale that paints for us
a picture of such fury and fear:
Once upon a time there was a peasant woman
and a very wicked woman she was.
And she died and did not leave a single good deed behind.
The devils caught her and plunged her into the lake of fire.
So her guardian angel stood and wondered what good deed of hers
he could remember to tell to God;
‘She once pulled up an onion in her garden,’ said he,
‘and gave it to a beggar woman.’
And God answered: ‘You take that onion then,
hold it out to her in the lake, and let her take hold and be pulled out.
And if you can pull her out of the lake, let her come to Paradise,
but if the onion breaks, then the woman must stay where she is.’
The angel ran to the woman and held out the onion to her.
‘Come,’ said he, ‘catch hold and I’ll pull you out.’
He began cautiously pulling her out.
He had just pulled her right out, when the other sinners in the lake,
seeing how she was being drawn out,
began catching hold of her so as to be pulled out with her.
But she was a very wicked woman and she began kicking them.
‘I’m to be pulled out, not you. It’s my onion, not yours.’
As soon as she said that, the onion broke.
And the woman fell into the lake and she is burning there to this day.
So the angel wept and went away.
Because she was convinced
that her single good deed belonged to her alone,
that God’s salvation was a limited commodity
that she had to grab for herself,
that those with her in the lake of fire were her rivals
rather than her fellow sufferers,
she found herself left in that lake for eternity
drowned in the fire of her own fear and fury.

But this is not who we are condemned to be.
In our second reading,
Paul speaks of a different kind of living,
what he calls “a still more excellent way,”
the way that prizes love above all else.
This love, Paul says, is not jealous, not pompous, not puffed-up, not rude,
“it does not seek its own interests, it is not quick-tempered,
it does not brood over injury.”
It is not filled with fear of being deprived of a blessing,
or fury at the good fortune of others,
but “bears all things, believes all things,
hopes all things, endures all things.”

If we want to be Christians,
if we want to live this still more excellent way,
we should pray that God fill us with this greatest of gifts,
the love that seeks not its own good
but rejoices in the good of others,
the love that led Jesus to endure the cross for all,
the love that conquers fear and fury.

Sunday, January 13, 2013

The Baptism of the Lord

Readings: Isaiah 40:1-5, 9-11; Titus 2:11-14; 3:4-7; Luke 3:15-16, 21-22

What did Jesus find when he went down
into the waters of the Jordan river,
to baptized at the hands of John?
What awaited him as he plunged into the bath of repentance
to which John had called his fellow Israelites
in preparation for the coming day of judgment?
Certainly not the washing away of his own sins;
Luke has already informed us in the beginning of his Gospel
that the child born of Mary is holy, the Son of God.
There was no need for Jesus to repent,
to turn his life around.
What, then, took place that day in the river Jordan?
What happened to him in those waters?

Today’s celebration of the Baptism of the Lord
concludes the Christmas season,
and reminds us that for the past few weeks
we have been doing something more
than simply celebrating Jesus’ birthday.
The Baptism of Jesus continues
the “epiphany” or “manifestation” of Jesus to the world
that we celebrated last Sunday:
the Father’s voice from heaven
and the descent of the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove
show to those present that Jesus is God’s beloved Son –
he truly is “Emmanuel,” God-with-us.

But there is an even deeper connection
between the Baptism of Jesus and the mystery of Christmas.
For the incarnation is not simply about God the eternal Son
taking on a human nature –
as stupendous as that event is –
but it is also about we humans
becoming, through Christ, partakers in God’s own nature.
The early Christian theologian Athanasius of Alexandria
wrote that Christ “was made human
that we might be made God" (De incarnatione no. 54).
This theme has echoed throughout the Christian tradition.
When the priest or deacon mixes water into the wine
at the preparation of the gifts at Mass
he prays, “may we come to share in the divinity of Christ
who humbled himself to share in our humanity.”
The poet Gerard Manly Hopkins put it this way:
      In a flash, at a trumpet crash, 
      I am all at once what Christ is, | since he was what I am.
This theme is sometimes called
the admirabile commercium or “wondrous exchange”:
God takes on human nature in all its frailty
so that we may take on the immortality of God’s own nature.
This is the event of our salvation that we celebrate at Christmas,
and it is also what we celebrate in the Baptism of Christ.

What did Jesus find when he went down into the water?
He found the waters of death that we had created.
And in those waters he found us:
drowned in the waters of chaos,
submerged in our alienation from God,
suffocated by our own unlovely sinful acts,
the dead bloated with the corpsegas
of pride and greed and envy.
And stripping himself of his immortality,
Jesus transformed those waters of death into waters of life,
exchanging his divine immortality for our human death,
so that we who were drowned in sin
might be raised with him to immortal life.
Through our baptism,
which St. Paul calls “the bath of rebirth,”
we become partners in that wondrous exchange.
In baptism the Holy Spirit poured out on Christ
is “richly poured out on us”;
in baptism God declares that we, like Christ,
are God’s beloved, on whom God’s favor rest;
in baptism, like Christ, heaven opened to us.

What did we find when we went down 
into the waters of baptism?
What awaited us in the bath of repentance?
We did not find death
but the robe of immortality
that Christ left for us there,
the glorious garment of which he stripped himself
so that we might be clothed in everlasting life.
Wrapped by Christ in that robe of light
we pray that we may be worthy of such a garment,
that we might live lives that reflect
the divine glory that has been given to us.
It was for this that God became a human being:
that God’s life and light might be reflected in us
who have become through grace 
what Christ is by nature:
beloved sons and daughters of God.

Sunday, January 6, 2013

Epiphany



We call this feast,
on which we recall the visit of the Magi to the Christ child,
“Epiphany,” from the Greek word epipháneia,
which means an appearance or manifestation.
We also use the word “epiphany” 
in a more secular sense,
one popularized by the novelist James Joyce,
to refer to flashes of profound realization
that seem to strike us from out of the blue.
Today it seems to be used for any insight,
some of them less-than-profound:
in a recent news story from Los Angeles,
a teacher at an elementary school
that had provided iPads for all its students
described the effect on learning as “an ephiphany.”
“Epiphany” is even the name for an integrated suite
of Customer Relations Management software.
Presumably using this software 
will give one striking new insights
into how to manage one’s customer relations.

But the epiphany that we celebrate today
is something more than an idea 
that suddenly occurs to the Wise Men.
What the Magi find in Bethlehem is not an idea, 
but a person: Jesus Christ.
Pope Benedict has written: “Being a Christian
is not the result of an ethical choice or a lofty idea,
but the encounter with an event, a person,
which gives life a new horizon
and a decisive direction” (Deus Caritas Est no. 1).
What the Pope is warning against here
is the temptation, on the one hand, 
to reduce being a Christian
to a set of ideas that we hold 
about God and the world –
making it something like 
a philosophical system –
or, on the other hand,
to transform it 
into a set of ethical positions –
whether this be a commitment to peace and justice
or to so-called “traditional values.”
Pope Benedict does not deny 
that Christianity commits us
both to certain truth claims 
about God and the world
and to certain ethical positions,
but the heart of Christianity is found 
neither in our ideas nor our ethics
but in our encounter with the person of Jesus Christ.

The Epiphany of the Wise Men
was not their being struck by a startling new notion,
nor their adoption of a new set of moral values,
but the transforming experience 
of meeting God in Jesus Christ.
Their epiphany is their encounter
with the God who has entered our world 
as a human child,
as love that makes itself weak and vulnerable
so as to become one with us in all things but sin.
As a result of this encounter 
they no doubt found themselves
thinking about God and the world in new ways.
After all, if you go searching for a king
and find yourself kneeling before a baby
in a humble dwelling in a small town,
it is bound to overturn 
much of what you thought you knew
about God and the world.
And based on this new understanding 
you very well might find yourself 
with a very different set of values
and a very different approach to living them out.
As Pope Benedict says, this encounter
“gives life a new horizon and a decisive direction.”
In the wake of this encounter,
Jesus Christ becomes for the Magi 
the new star whom they will follow
on their journey of return 
to their true homeland in God’s kingdom.

And this is true for us too.
Our protestant brothers and sisters often speak
of having “a personal relationship with Christ.”
I used to react negatively to this phrase
because I thought it referred to having
a private relationship with God 
that took no account of other people.
This would run completely counter 
to our Catholic tradition
of the importance of the Church community 
in our life as Christians.
But now I see that 
speaking of a “personal relationship” with Jesus
is less about having your own personal Jesus
and more about having a relationship with Jesus
as a person who is even now living and active.
Perhaps this is something we Catholics need to learn
from our protestant brothers and sisters.
Pope Benedict himself reminds us
that Jesus is not someone 
who lived an long, long time ago
and left behind some interesting ideas 
and ethical injunctions.
Jesus is the risen Lord whom we can encounter
in a way that is just as direct and just as personal
as the encounter of the Magi with the Christ child.

We encounter him in the words of Scripture,
in prayer, 
in the sacraments,
in the poor and the suffering, 
and in each other.
The epiphany of God as love 
is not something that happened long ago;
it is something that is happening here and now.
Just as with the Magi, 
Jesus shows himself to us
so that he might become 
both the star that we follow
and the companion who walks beside us,
on our journey to God’s kingdom.